Conducting Targeted Manual Tests
This section provides a structured guide for conducting manual accessibility tests. The goal is to present concrete test steps and sensible procedures that can identify common barriers – beyond the capabilities of automated tools.
Why targeted manual tests are necessary
Many barriers cannot be reliably detected by automated testing tools. These include:
- Context-dependent content (e.g., meaning of an image or link)
- Keyboard operability
- Comprehensibility of content
- Meaningful semantic structure
- Focus control and interactions
A systematic manual testing process enables reliable assessment of these aspects and contributes to holistic quality assurance.
Typical test areas and procedures
- Keyboard operation
- Check tab order (logical, complete, no tab traps)
- Visible focus for every interactive element
- Activation of buttons, menus, links, etc. with Enter/Space
- Navigation in complex elements like dialogs, accordions, or tabs
- Contrast and visual design
- Sufficient color contrast between text and background (WCAG 1.4.3 / 1.4.11)
- Readability through adequate font size, line height, font type
- Focus highlights for interactive elements
- Forms
- Each field has a visible, correctly linked label
- Error messages are understandable and accessible (e.g., for screen readers)
- Required fields and validation rules are clearly communicated
- Semantic structure and orientation
- Correct heading hierarchy (H1-H6)
- Use of landmark roles (e.g., nav, main, footer)
- Unique link texts and descriptive button labels
- Use of breadcrumbs or other orientation aids
- Comprehensibility of content
- Simple, clear language and understandable sentence structure
- Consistent naming and terminology
- Logical structure of content and instructions
Tools for support:
- Browser developer tools for focus testing, semantics, and contrast
- Extensions such as Axe DevTools, WAVE, or Accessibility Insights for preliminary testing
- Contrast checkers (e.g., Color Contrast Analyzer)
- Text analysis tools for checking readability and language
Recommended practice:
- Combine tests with multiple roles (e.g., UX, QA, developers)
- Work with checklists (e.g., WCAG Quickref, project-specific)
- Document results to implement improvements systematically
- Optionally involve user groups to test real usage scenarios
Screen reader testing For screen reader-specific tests, see – Testing with screen readers.